Opposing counsels in a federal trade secret misappropriation trial are claiming to have prevailed in filings on court costs. However, the jury verdict and final judgment awarded zero dollars to a plaintiff who sought more than $5.5 million in damages.

A Segal McCambridge team claims to have secured a defense verdict in a case where a Midland-based plaintiff sued its former employees and the Chicago-based firm they joined.

Who Won?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]