According to claimant Mark Schmidt, the court’s phrasing of the question was broader than what his employer raised in its appeal, expanding the issue to encompass an employer’s duty to reimburse injured workers for not just CBD oil, but any type of over-the-counter item.
May 02, 2024 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to take up a case that could significantly expand the kinds of treatments for which injured workers can receive compensation.
The high court’s Tuesday order in Schmidt v. Schmidt, Kirifides & Rassias granted an appeal of a split Commonwealth Court ruling determining that an employer violated the Workers’ Compensation Act by failing to reimburse its employee for CBD oil he used to treat a workplace injury.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices. Courtesy photo
