Conservative Activist Ed Whelan Apologizes for Tweets About Kavanaugh Accuser
Ed Whelan went on a Twitter storm Thursday to attack the credibility of Christine Blasey Ford, who accuses Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during the 1980s. Whelan, a former Scalia clerk and Harvard law grad, apologized Friday for "an appalling and inexcusable mistake of judgment."
September 21, 2018 at 09:58 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Conservative activist Ed Whelan, under fire for a series of tweets that were designed to boost attacks on the credibility of the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, apologized Friday on Twitter for what he called “an appalling and inexcusable” mistake in judgment.
Whelan, who has backed Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, posted tweets late Thursday that used yearbook photos, housing records and maps to suggest the accuser, California professor Christine Blasey Ford, might be confusing Kavanaugh with another high school classmate at Georgetown Preparatory in suburban Washington. He has since deleted those tweets.
Whelan tweeted Friday morning: “I made an appalling and inexcusable mistake of judgment in posting the tweet thread in a way that identified Kavanaugh's Georgetown Prep classmate. I take full responsibility for that mistake, and I deeply apologize for it. I realize that does not undo the mistake.”
Ford claims Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her during the 1980s, pinning her to a bed, groping her and covering her mouth to prevent her from screaming. Kavanaugh has denied the claims. His supporters, walking a cautious path, have suggested another person might have been responsible for the alleged attack. Kavanaugh has agreed to testify next week, and Ford's lawyers at Washington's Katz, Marshall & Banks are negotiating the contours of her potential testimony.
Whelan, a Harvard Law School graduate and a popular conservative voice on judicial nomination matters, came under criticism almost immediately for his tweets. Some observers questioned whether Whelan, who identified a former classmate of Kavanaugh as resembling him, could have committed libel. Ford, through her lawyers, told media outlets Thursday “there is zero chance that I would confuse them.”
Whelan said in a statement Friday morning: “No one urged or in any way asked me to make the apology. It was entirely my decision.” He also said: “I did not work with anyone in the White House or on the judiciary committee in preparing my tweet thread.”
On Sept. 18, Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington and a former clerk to the late Antonin Scalia, predicted on Twitter that Kavanaugh, a week from then, “will have been clearly vindicated on this matter. Specifically, I expect that compelling evidence will show his categorical denial to be truthful.”
Whelan has followed Kavanaugh's nomination from the beginning, including attending President Donald Trump's East Room announcement of the D.C. Circuit judge's nomination in July, and live-tweeting the confirmation hearing.
There was debate on Twitter on Thursday night about whether and how much Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee and Trump officials had prior knowledge of Whelan's plan before he executed it on social media.
The Senate Judiciary Committee distanced itself from Whelan's tweets, saying the committee “had no knowledge of involvement” in Whelan's Twitter storm. Whelan said Thursday night in his posts that “I do not state, imply or insinuate” that Kavanaugh's classmate “or anyone else committed the sexual assault that Ford alleges.”
Last year, Whelan co-edited a book of Scalia's speeches and writings titled “Scalia Speaks” along with Scalia's son Christopher. In his postings for the National Review, Whelan is a frequent and unabashed critic of liberal judges and the news media. He writes a regular feature called “This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism.”
Read more:
Tony Mauro, C. Ryan Barber and Ellis Kim contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Georgia RICO Case Against Trump Likely to Avoid Trial Amid Election Win, Nationally-Known Law Professor Says
Paxton's Suit Against Election Monitors Is Latest in Flurry of Voting Litigation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250