Credit: LeitnerR/Adobe Stock UK Legal Scholars Track Down 17th Century Murder Case, Prove Supreme Court Wrong
The often-cited British common law is not always what the justices say it is, the researchers found.
June 14, 2023 at 06:18 PM
10 minute read
United States Supreme Court
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
When the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an Alabama man's double jeopardy defense in 2019, it did so largely based on the "feeble" and "shaky" historical evidence he had offered in support of his argument.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Supreme Court Grapples With San Francisco's Aging Sewer System in EPA Case
Justices Appear Split Over Trucker's RICO Lawsuit Against Cannabis Companies
With 3 High Court Cases, This Law School Is Putting On A Clinic
Supreme Court Will Decide If the 5th Circuit Allows 'Blatant Forum Shopping'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
