First a Big Law Innovation, Then a Split
Two partners who helped create the Data Law Center have left Akerman, announcing last week the launch of a now eight-lawyer boutique in Chicago called Actuate Law that they said will be focused on building more expert systems without what they described as Big Law bureaucracy.
March 20, 2018 at 06:15 PM
5 minute read
Launched in 2015, the Akerman Data Law Center is a novel product from an Am Law 100 firm.
By combining research from Thomson Reuters Corp. and legal thinking from Akerman lawyers into software from Neota Logic Inc., the Data Law Center automates legal advice in the wake of a data breach. Clients pay a subscription fee for access to what some call a “legal expert system.”
When the Financial Times named former Akerman CEO Andrew Smulian in December as a Top 10 legal innovator for North America, in part thanks to the Data Law Center, Smulian pointed out that the advent of big data was “changing the way all lawyers practice law.”
Just maybe not fast enough.
Two partners who helped create the Data Law Center have left Akerman, announcing last week the launch of a now eight-lawyer boutique in Chicago called Actuate Law that they said will be focused on building more expert systems without what they described as Big Law bureaucracy.
“You have to invest in these types of things in order to win business in today's market,” said Martin Tully, one of five founders of Actuate Law and a former co-chairman of Akerman's data law practice involved in the development of the firm's Data Law Center. “We're not trying to convince some far-flung committee of the wisdom of this. We know it to be true.”
Jeffrey Sharer, the co-chairman of Akerman's data law practice who is widely credited with creating the Data Law Center, did not return a request for comment about his former colleagues.
In response to questions about ongoing plans to develop more products such as the Data Law Center, an Akerman spokesman said the firm believes innovation is a “business necessity” and that it provides “incentives and rewards” to professionals who spend time building products like the Data Law Center.
“We acknowledge that developing legal products in a professional services environment is challenging, but we are encouraged by our continued results,” the statement said. “We are solving complex client challenges in new ways, developing sophisticated tech-based legal products and continuously adapting our innovation platform. This platform provides the latitude necessary for our professionals to support these types of efforts and drives our firm to think beyond the traditional law firm model or billing structure.”
Despite its success as a new kind of legal product, Akerman's Data Law Center is not immune from some of the difficulties large law firms can have making upfront investments of lawyer time and money in products that may or may not pay off down the road. Few, if any, firms have designed robust systems to incentivize or reward work that is not based on the billable hour. That could hinder large firms from providing these types of new services.
Dara Tarkowski, another Akerman-turned-Actuate partner once involved in the Data Law Center, said expert systems are easier to develop inside a small firm.
The founders of Actuate Law were motivated to launch their firm in part by the success of the Akerman tool, Tarkowski said. In Tarkowski's practice counseling new financial services and technology firms, she said she saw plenty of opportunity—with up to 30 ideas—to create lower-cost solutions for startup companies to navigate complex regulatory environments.
As founders of a small firm, the new Actuate partners said they won't face some of the problems that can come with building products inside a larger firm where most partners are selling their time.
“As owners of the firm, we are taking the laboring oar to put our money where our mouths are,” Tarkowski said. “Martin and I don't have to worry about how we're going to figure out a way to compensate [other partners], because we're the people doing it. He and I, with the support of our partners, are the ones investing our time and committing our resources to do it because we believe in it.”
The five founders of Actuate Law first worked together at Katten Muchin Rosenman before Tarkowski, Tully and Douglas Albritton, a commercial litigator, joined Akerman's Chicago office in 2014. (Albritton had a stop at Reed Smith in the interim.) Two other founding partners, Charles Chejfec and Phil Tortorich, were partners at Katten until leaving for Actuate Law.
In addition to a focus on expert systems, the founders of Actuate Law said they offer more flexible billing arrangements than those often found in Big Law, including working with litigation finance firms to offer contingency fees. Actuate Law also rewards all of its lawyers, including associates and nonequity partners, with cash bonuses for originating new clients and work at the firm.
By being in a smaller firm, lawyers are free from rate pressure and client conflicts that had precluded them from working with a number of middle-market clients, Albritton said.
“We think Big Law will become increasingly hostile to the middle market,” added Albritton, “because Big Law likes to brag about how high their billing rates are and how high their profits per partner are. And that decimates the middle-market client that doesn't want to pay for that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250