Can Wigdor's Jeanne Christensen Make Uber Pay?
The sole female partner at plaintiffs firm Wigdor LLP has been in the middle of some of the biggest cases of the #MeToo era.
May 07, 2018 at 03:50 PM
4 minute read
Good plaintiffs lawyers have always known how to seize a moment and capitalize on a trend.
But when it comes to Jeanne Christensen, who has represented women suing Fox News, The Weinstein Co., and hedge fund billionaire Steve Cohen over the past year, it's not just about riding a wave of sexual abuse, harassment and discrimination allegations.
Christensen, the sole female partner at New York's Wigdor LLP and the lead lawyer in a proposed class action claiming Uber Technologies Inc. failed to protect “countless” female customers from rape and assault, said she has experienced discrimination firsthand. And she has been pursuing claims against Uber since 2015, long before accusations against Harvey Weinstein launched the #MeToo movement.
“I had been thinking about Uber for a long time. One day, I literally got up and realized this is a class action case,” she said. “If you are going to be a litigator, you have to [be] willing to put a new type of claim, you can't be afraid to put it out there. That was something I already knew about and about how bad the problem was, and how much it was covered up.”
Uber has denied the claims in the proposed class action and is being defended by Perkins Coie. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in March in federal court in Oakland.
“The allegations brought forth in this case are important to us and we take them very seriously,” the company said in a statement.
Christensen started practicing in 1992, after graduating from the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. Before launching her own firm, she said she was turned down while applying for law firm jobs because she was pregnant. Since coming to Wigdor in 2014, despite name partner Douglas Wigdor's high-profile, she said she has worked hard to win credit for her own role on cases.
“I work very hard at it,” Christensen said. “I don't think anyone would describe me as abrasive, but I don't think meekly.
Those efforts have helped to raise her profile dramatically over the past year, and Christensen said she's become a go-to female legal expert for reporters delivering stories about harassment allegations.
The New Yorker staff writer Sheelah Kolhatkar, NBC's Megyn Kelly and CNN's Wolf Blitzer have all recently given Christensen a platform. (Only Michael Avenatti, Stormy Daniels' omnipresent lawyer, may be able to claim more airtime.)
During an interview with CNN last month about the Uber case, Christensen noted her prior experience suing Uber on behalf of individual women, saying “Uber has done a miraculous job of keeping the story quiet.” With her proposed class action, she is taking her fight against Uber to a new, much more public level.
“We're not simply going to file cases so Uber pays women and their lawyers money to be quiet about it, and that was a conscious decision that we made,” she told CNN.
Female plaintiffs have been drawn to Christensen, who has filed 25 employment discrimination cases in federal court since 2010 against hospitals, restaurants and financial services companies, among other defendants. Her former clients and even lawyers who previously opposed her have recommended her, Christensen said.
But her own gender has also been a factor, she said. “They are calling me because they don't want to call a male lawyer,” Christensen said. “I don't want to say that is the No. 1 reason, because then it makes it seem like I haven't done anything. But some women are looking for a woman lawyer when in the past they may have sought the counsel of a man.”
She also sees a deficit of female lawyers handling sexual assault and harassment cases, particularly for plaintiffs who are not high-profile or top executives. “There are very few women in this space,” Christensen said.
Her own experience with sex-related discrimination has helped her relate to clients, she said. “I don't need someone to tell me what it is like to be discriminated against about pregnancies,” she said. “That comes through. There is just no substitute for that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Law Firms Get Hacked, Are Their Corporate Clients on the Hook?
Former Mayer Brown Counsel Alleges Disability Discrimination Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Duane Morris Uses Nonequity Partnership as 'Income Shifting' Device, Class Action Contends
5 minute readFTX Customers Double Down on Claims Against Sullivan & Cromwell
Trending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250