Taft Stettinius, A Firm With Historic Ties, Expands Once Again
Taft Stettinius & Hollister, a Midwest firm with its roots in Ohio, has continued a years-long regional expansion binge by bolting on the Indiana operations of Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff. It also has some big cases on its docket.
May 08, 2018 at 05:22 PM
5 minute read
Robert Hicks, managing partner and chairman of the executive committee at Taft Stettinius & Hollister.
Taft Stettinius & Hollister, a fast-growing regional firm, has expanded its presence in Indianapolis by bolting on a 15-lawyer group, including eight partners, from Cleveland-based Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff.
The additions, which became effective within the past few weeks, are the latest bid by Taft Stettinius to grow into one of the Midwest's largest firms.
“We've grown quite a bit at a time when others seem to be shrinking or going to major markets,” said Robert Hicks, who last year took over as Taft Stettinius' chairman and managing partner. “[But] we're trying to still stay a Midwestern big regional firm.”
In 2017, Taft Stettinius saw its head count rise to 365 lawyers on the back of a whopping 51 lateral hires. The firm's gross revenue soared by 20 percent, to roughly $230 million, Hicks said. As of this week, Hicks said Taft Stettinius now has about 450 lawyers scattered throughout the firm's 10 offices nationwide.
“We're trying to build the right platform and toolbox for all of our lawyers to deliver in each of their markets,” Hicks said. “We've had quite a bit of success in doing that and we're only in the second or third inning of a nine-inning game, in my mind.”
Taft Stettinius traces its history back to a law partnership founded in Cincinnati in 1885. But in 1924, Robert Taft and Charles Taft II, sons of former President William Howard Taft, who also once served as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, joined the firm as it changed its name to its current iteration.
Within the past two decades, Taft Stettinius has rapidly expanded outside of Cincinnati through strategic mergers with other regional firms. In 2001, it absorbed Cleveland-based Kelley McCann & Livingston and seven years later merged with Kahn Kleinman, moves that saw Taft Stettinius' northern Ohio operations reach some 70 lawyers.
In 2008, Taft Stettinius expanded into Indianapolis through another merger with Sommer Barnard, followed by a 2011 combination with Columbus, Ohio-based Chester Willcox & Saxbe. In 2014, Taft Stettinius entered Chicago after acquiring local firm Shefsky & Froelich.
The group defecting from Benesch Friedlander, which includes partners Jeffrey Abrams, Kiamesha-Sylvia Colom, Melvin Daniel, Peter French, Andrew Kleiman, Jeffrey Kosc, Andi Metzel and James Schwarz, brings Taft Stettinius' head count to 120 lawyers in Indianapolis, making it the fourth-largest firm in the city, according to local news reports.
Hicks said that size is ideal for a firm in Indianapolis, although he noted that Taft Stettinius is still looking to grow its operations in Chicago, Cleveland and Columbus, as well as expand into other markets such as Denver, Kansas City, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh and St. Louis.
“The goal would be to acquire really strong, midsized firms who would become part of a larger platform,” said Hicks, noting that Taft Stettinius has no plans to enter major markets like Atlanta, Los Angeles or New York. “We're not trying to be in those high-rate markets because it's very difficult to manage high-rate markets with our Midwestern [presence].”
Hicks said the rate structure at Taft Stettinius is less than 50 percent of that at the top Wall Street firms. Nonetheless, Hicks' firm still gets its share of high-profile cases.
In addition to its corporate work, Taft Stettinius has also taken the lead on some landmark toxic tort contingency cases. Last year the firm reached a $671 million settlement with E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. and The Chemours Co. over the production of a chemical used to make Teflon. The litigation, chronicled in The New York Times Magazine feature story, alleged that the chemical giants had contaminated the drinking supply of thousands in the Ohio River Valley.
“We use it as a tool to develop a great economic model that actually does a lot of environmental good,” said Hicks about his firm's contingency work, which he added accounts for about 4 percent of its yearly billable hours.
Taft Stettinius is now serving as lead counsel on a series of opioid cases stemming from the opioid and heroin epidemics ravaging cities across Indiana. Those cases have been consolidated in multidistrict litigation against opioid manufacturers now pending in Cleveland.
“It's really nice when you have a well-financed company like ours that's actually behind the litigation because it means the defendants actually take it very seriously,” Hicks said. “They have a real significant law firm prosecuting the case [and] it creates a different dynamic than if you're a small plaintiffs firm.”
The new recruits from Benesch Friedlander are already also contributing to Taft Stettinius' profits for 2018. An Indiana municipality recent approved the transfer of a $322,704.78 legal services contract with former Benesch Friedlander partner Daniel in Indianapolis to the firm, according to local news reports. Benesch Friedlander has since shuttered its operations in Indiana.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250