Is Sandra Goldstein the Highest Paid Female Partner in Big Law?
Any way you look at it, the Kirkland & Ellis litigation partner is making fat stacks of cash—particularly at a time when women still lag behind men at most firms.
May 29, 2018 at 05:05 PM
6 minute read
It's big news when a partner leaves the hallowed halls of Cravath, Swaine & Moore. And even bigger news when the partner is a woman. But when that move comes with reports that she'll be making $11 million annually for the next five years (not counting the sign-up bonus), the news is a showstopper.
That describes Sandra Goldstein, who recently vaulted to Kirkland & Ellis from Cravath. Though it's hard to say if she's officially the highest paid female partner in Big Law, I'm willing to bet she's way up there. (According to The New York Times, which broke the story about her compensation, the amount “is an estimate and not technically a guarantee,” though two people involved in discussions with her confirmed the amount.)
Any way you look at it, Goldstein is making buckets of moolah—particularly at a time when women still lag behind men at most firms.
So who is Goldstein? How did she do it? And what advice does she have for other women?
Below is an edited version of my chat with Goldstein at Kirkland's midtown office in Manhattan.
You grew up at Cravath. You went there right out of NYU Law School in 1987, and you were the youngest associate to make partner (at age 30). Why did you leave it for Kirkland?
Kirkland has energetic, business-minded people and an enormously diverse practice. I was at Cravath for 30 years and I have friends there, but this was a choice to go to firm with an even greater platform.
They strike me as polar opposites—Cravath is traditional and lockstep, while Kirkland has a reputation of being the Wild West where partners eat what they kill. Did you find that a culture shock?
Culture is a big word. it depends on how you break it down. There's an extraordinary culture of collaboration at Kirkland. I've already been introduced to new clients. I'll still be doing securities litigation and commercial litigation. There's greater breadth of practice here, like private equity. It's not changing but expanding my practice.
I have to ask about that fat elephant in the room—that fat compensation package you reportedly are getting at Kirkland. Did you jump ship for the money?
I did not decide to leave Cravath after 30 years for monetary reasons.
Let's talk about how you got where you are. By any measure—for men or women—you've been extremely successful. You must have enormous drive.
I had a spectacular role model in my mom [Gloria Goldstein]. She was a trial lawyer for 22 years with my dad, then became judge of New York Supreme Court, and then elevated to the appellate division. She's in her late 80s, and she is still working at the appellate division as a judicial hearing officer. She failed at retiring.
Interesting you cite your mom. I've talked to a number of women partners who credit having a working mother for their careers.
My mother was committed to her career and her three children. There was never a time in my childhood when I wished she was present. She was always there, and I never wanted for attention. If she was able to do it, I could, too, because she had it much harder. My mother graduated No. 1 from Brooklyn Law School, but it was not acceptable at the time for a woman to be in that position. The school held a private ceremony for her, but it was a male student who gave the graduation speech. When I graduated from NYU [law school], I didn't feel like a pariah the way my mother did.
There's obviously been progress since your mother's time. Did you ever experience sexism in your own career?
I didn't experience bias on a global level. I never thought men didn't want me to succeed. But did people underestimate me? Absolutely. And if an opponent underestimated me, I thought that was great because I made sure they paid for it!
You've succeeded phenomenally, but that's not true for women overall. How do you assess the pace of change for women in the last 30 years ?
There are a lot more programs and discussion about making sure that women know that they can succeed. And there's more focus that you can pursue career and family.
The profession is not right for everyone. It is an exceedingly rewarding but hard job that requires time and tenacity.
You have three kids, as did your mother. So what's the lesson to having it all or at least doing it all?
In my mom's mind, everyone has a choice. You do what you want is what she taught us. If you want to be a lawyer in a big firm, you do it. If you want to opt out, you do that. My mom never said, “You will face these challenges.” My parents encouraged me and my brothers the same way and told us we had the wherewithal to do what we wanted.
And did you set a goal early on to be a partner at a major firm?
I thought I'd eventually join Goldstein & Goldstein, my dad and brother's practice! I didn't walk into Cravath and think I'd be partner one day. But I also didn't think I was limited. You shouldn't be so dead-set about what you'll do when you're 25.
You ultimately decided to go for it at Cravath—and got the prize. So what is your ultimate advice for lawyers, particularly women, who want to succeed in this competitive profession?
The three most important qualities for the job are judgment, tenacity and confidence. They have to work in tandem, and that's true for women and men. To the extent that women might have less confidence than men, sometimes they have to say to themselves, “You can do this.” You have to picture yourself at that table, in that courtroom. A lot of things are nerve-wrecking, and you need to psyche yourself up. So if you need to talk to yourself, do it. The more you succeed, the more you will succeed.
Vivia Chen is at [email protected] and on Twitter @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250