Harassment Reports Up Amid #MeToo Movement, New Data Shows
Have the allegations against Harvey Weinstein encouraged more survivors of workplace harassment to speak out? Looks like it.
April 10, 2018 at 03:52 PM
4 minute read
Credit: thodonal88/Shutterstock.com
The rise of the #MeToo movement is having an impact on companies, according to new data from compliance software company Navex Global.
The 2018 Hotline Incident Management Report, which pulled company complaints from more than 13,000 Navex clients across a wide range of industries, showed that HR and harassment reports were up in the last quarter of 2017, coinciding with the growing visibility of the #MeToo movement.
Harassment and sexual assault allegations against film producer Harvey Weinstein were reported in a New York Times investigation published last October, and helped put the movement in sharp focus, leading to accusations against a long list of prominent men in entertainment, business and beyond.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your inbox with Labor of Law by Erin Mulvaney. Learn more and sign up here.
That trend seems to be echoed in Navex's findings. The number of reports classified as harassment before Oct. 5, the date the Weinstein article was published, made up about 9.8 percent of the total report volume. After that date, about 10.9 percent of all reports were related to harassment.
Navex acknowledged that while the number of reports is up, the rise is only a slight one. “Trust within an organization is built slowly,” the software company said in a press release Tuesday.
In a Navex webcast following the report's release, Scott Nelson, a partner at Baker McKenzie, said, “we're just seeing the tip of the iceberg with the #MeToo movement.”
He noted that he wouldn't be surprised to see more reports next year. This is because workers increasingly feel like they have a voice, particularly millennials, he said. Nelson also said the media coverage of harassment in the #MeToo era is “deeper” and “more pronounced” than other times in history.
“This movement is going to have some legs for a while,” Nelson said in the webinar.
Navex found in its report that while HR and ethics and compliance officers have taken action to address harassment, the data also showed that many in upper management, including those in the C-suite, corporate boards or senior leadership, are not providing a sufficient level of support.
Overall, the median case closure time in all cases in 2017, including accounting, business integrity, environmental health and other issues, was 44 days, up from 42 days the year before. With reports about HR, diversity and workplace respect, the median case closure time was 41 days, the same time frame as in 2016.
“Although these leaders emphasize 'zero tolerance,' the numbers do not show that reports are being addressed in a timely manner,” the Navex report said.
Here are some of the tips Navex offered in its webcast to organizations trying to address ethics and compliance complaints:
- Increase focus on anti-retaliation efforts.
- Continue to work on getting cases closed within best practice ranges.
- Get a more complete picture of your risks by documenting all reports in one centralized incident management system.
- Make the business case for matching your report volume with appropriate resources.
- Encourage employees to see your hotline as a resource for information, not just a channel for reporting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAggressive FTC May Force Merging Companies to Bolster Legal Defenses
4 minute readBest Legal Departments: How Blackstone's Legal and Compliance Team Got the All-Clear to Grow Business
CEOs Want Data-Based Risk Management; GCs Lack the Tech to Do So.
InCloudCounsel Hires First GC to Continue Expansion in Asia
Trending Stories
- 1'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
- 2NY District Attorneys Are Still No Fans of Revamped Misconduct Watchdog
- 3ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Israel's Prime Minister Over Alleged War Crimes in Gaza
- 4Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 5Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250