Connecticut Firms Not Weeding Out Marijuana Practices, Despite Legislative Setback
Seeing an opportunity for more business, Brown Paindiris & Scott is pressing forward with its marijuana law division.
May 09, 2018 at 03:10 PM
4 minute read
The legislative session ended before Connecticut lawmakers considered a bill that would have legalized recreational marijuana use, but law firms eyeing that practice area remain optimistic.
Hartford firm Brown Paindiris & Scott, for instance, still sees enough opportunity to launch and maintain a venture in marijuana law. Despite limited medical marijuana use in the Nutmeg state, and at least another year's wait before legislators again consider the possibility of recreational use becoming legal, two Brown Paindiris lawyers will continue to focus on that business line.
Two of the firm's 21 attorneys—managing partner Nicholas Paindiris and associate Ian Butler—began working with clients Jan. 1, assisting with opening dispensaries and other business efforts. They say the possibility of marijuana legalization in 2019 will be an impetus for even more law firms to enter the practice.
“It would be simple supply and demand,” Butler said.
Larger firms have been hesitant to devote resources because of ongoing controversy surrounding marijuana legalization, but attorneys such as Butler point to skyrocketing revenue for entrepreneurs in markets with legalized recreational use. Notwithstanding a federal prohibition, for instance, the emerging industry generated about $9 billion in sales in 2017 in states with legalized recreational and medical use, according to cannabis industry tracker BDS Analytics.
Looking to stay ahead of the curve, Butler said the firm decided earlier this year to enter what could be a booming business for attorneys, especially with recreational use due to become legal in Massachusetts on July 1.
“We decided to go this route because medicinal marijuana is a new industry to Connecticut, and the legal changes in Massachusetts also played a role in our decision,” Butler said. “It's coming to a neighboring state and it made us feel like something is on the horizon here.”
Butler said his firm has assisted three businesses in preparing applications for dispensaries related to medical marijuana in the state. “Today, we only represent dispensaries because there has not been a wave of applications for producers of marijuana,” he said in an interview Wednesday.
But he expects that to change if Connecticut legislators pass the bill next year.
“If it becomes legal, it will involve all areas,” Butler said. “There would be more dispensaries looking for legal advice and producers too. They'd have legal needs like regulatory compliance and issues with licenses and contracts.”
Some pro-legalization groups believed legalization would take place in the state this year, especially with the appropriations committee voting 27-24 last month to approve the bill. But as polls show growing support among residents, supporters say legalization in 2019 is a real possibility.
Attorney and legislator Steve Stafstrom Jr., who favors recreational use of marijuana, said the right makeup in the Legislature could weigh in proponents' favor.
Stafstrom, an associate with Pullman & Comley, represents Bridgeport in the Legislature. He pointed out the potential for a new governor, who might support legalization, while Gov. Dannel Malloy has spoken out against recreational use. Plus, Stafstrom said every incumbent lawmaker is up for re-election, and polls show about 70 percent of Connecticut residents approve legalization.
“The makeup of the legislature will be different,” he said. “I think if people are paying attention to the polls, they will see an overwhelming percentage of the residents want legalization.”
If legalization passes, Stafstrom said, “it will have an impact in the employee/employer context; it will certainly have an impact in criminal prosecution; and it will also likely have an impact on real estate development and the siting of land because there would likely be the opening of several marijuana distribution centers. It will definitely have an impact on the legal profession.”
Criminal defense attorney Hugh Keefe said the biggest change could involve a decline in drug-related charges from traffic stops.
“It will have the biggest effect [on] the pretext searches police make on people in cars,” said Keefe, a partner with Lynch, Traub, Keefe & Errante in New Haven. “It's very common to read a police report where the investigating [officer] will stop a vehicle for a minor traffic offense and, when they ask the driver for their license and registration, they allegedly smell marijuana. It's then off to the races for whoever has the weed.”
“If [marijuana] is legal and they smell marijuana, so what,” Keefe said. “Legalizing recreational marijuana will cut down on the number of illegal searches and seizures.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMall of America Dealt Another Blow in Quest to End $10-Per-Year Lease With Sears
3 minute readJudge Awards $48.6 Million to Frontier Airlines in COVID-19 Breach of Contract Suit
With Employment Law in National Spotlight, Contractor Scores in Trade Secrets Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
- 2'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 3Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 4Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 5State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250