Steady Growth Continues at Holland & Knight
Thanks to strong performances by its financial services, corporate and litigation practices, gross revenue at Holland & Knight grew 5.6 percent in 2017, to $848 million.
March 01, 2018 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Holland & Knight's steady growth continued in 2017 as the Am Law 100 firm's top line hit $848 million, up 5.6 percent from the $803 million in gross revenue it took in the year prior.
Revenue per lawyer grew 5.1 percent, to $786,000, while profits per partner grew 5.4 percent, to $1.360 million, up from $1.29 million in 2016. Overall head count at Holland & Knight remained mostly flat at 1,079, and the number of equity partners dipped 3.2 percent, to 179.
“We had another very good year,” said Holland & Knight managing partner Steven Sonberg, elected a decade ago as leader of the firm.
At the time, Sonberg found himself running one of the largest firms in Florida right when the bottom dropped out of the U.S. economy, with the Sunshine State particularly hard hit. Despite some initial hardships, Holland & Knight proved resilient, posting increases in gross revenue, net income and profits per equity partner since 2009, Sonberg said.
“We think we've had a good run in terms of being able to come out of the 2009 downturn and we've been able to continue that,” Sonberg said.
In order to weather the financial crisis, Holland & Knight implemented a strategic plan focusing on growth in the U.S. and Latin America in areas and practices where the firm was already strong, Sonberg said.
“Rather than just looking for growth for growth's sake, our additions were really focused in areas where we had strength and it was very much an opportunity for doubling down on that strength,” Sonberg said.
And the firm continued that strategy in 2017 with several high profile additions across the country.
In Miami, Holland & Knight recruited former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Wifredo Ferrer as head of its global compliance and investigations team, while also adding ex-Baker McKenzie CFO Stewart Kasner as a private wealth partner in the city.
The firm picked up a four-partner team of commercial lending lawyers from Jones Day in Atlanta and bolted on two more partners in Boston, including former Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr energy and clean technology group co-chair Mark Kalpin.
Across the Atlantic, Holland & Knight's London office, which opened its doors in 2016 via the firm's acquisition of U.K.-based Clark Ricketts, brought on an aviation finance team from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
Holland & Knight did see some notable departures last year, such as Charles Tobin, a First Amendment litigator who decamped for Ballard Spahr, where he now co-chairs that firm's media and entertainment law group in Washington, D.C.
Sonberg said strong performances by the firm's financial services practice, as well as its corporate and M&A group, particularly in the area of private equity, propelled Holland & Knight's financial growth in 2017.
The firm advised PharMerica Corp. on its $1.4 billion privatization deal with the Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and buyout giant KKR & Co. LP. Holland & Knight also represented private energy developer Stone Capital Corp. in its $500 million project bond offering that financed four power generating plants around Buenos Aires.
On the litigation side, Sonberg said the firm's white-collar and investigations practices also had a strong year.
Holland & Knight successfully defended Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. and its former CEO Colin Veitch in a $90 million defamation suit. The firm also represented the estate of Subway co-founder Frederick DeLuca in a high-profile jury trial that saw the its client receive a judgment of more than $23 million, as Holland & Knight reaped more than $10 million in fees and costs.
The firm's real estate practice was also busy in 2017, landing roles on deals such as advising Marriott International Inc. in management agreements for the tallest luxury hotel in Toronto and Victor Group and Lendlease Corp. Ltd. in a $369 million financing for a condominium project at New York's 281 Fifth Avenue.
And while Sonberg said that Holland & Knight remains conservative in its predictions for 2018, the firm has already hit the ground running, swiping five Jones Day lawyers in Mexico City.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250