GBI Expands Criminal Investigation of Fulton DA to Include Subpoenas to Atlanta Police
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has expanded an ongoing criminal probe of Paul Howard to include his issuance of grand jury subpoenas without a grand jury impaneled to handle the shooting of Rayshard Brooks.
July 09, 2020 at 08:42 PM
3 minute read
The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has expanded an ongoing investigation of Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard to include his office's issuance of grand jury subpoenas related to the shooting of Rayshard Brooks, all while not having a grand jury impaneled.
GBI Director Vic Reynolds confirmed Thursday that Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr has asked him to investigate Howard's issuance of grand jury subpoenas. Fulton County has not had a grand jury impaneled since March because of COVID-19.
Reynolds said the subpoenas will become part of the GBI's ongoing criminal investigation of about $140,000 in payments Howard received between 2015 and 2019 as CEO of two charitable organizations. Howard also faces a parallel 12-count complaint by the state Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission that he violated campaign finance disclosure laws by failing to report earnings.
Reynolds declined to discuss details of the expanded investigation. Under Georgia law, an individual who misuses a subpoena could face contempt of court, and be fined and jailed up to 20 days.
Reynolds said the GBI is conducting an independent investigation of Brooks' homicide at the request of the Atlanta Police Department.
Former prosecutors have said Howard's issuance a of grand jury subpoena for Atlanta police records without having a grand jury impaneled violates a state statute requiring that subpoenas be tied to a specific court date.
The records Howard attempted to subpoena involve a use of force investigation of former Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe, who is charged with multiple felonies, including felony murder, in the June 12 shooting of Rayshard Brooks in a fast-food parking lot in south Atlanta. Rolfe is currently free on $500,000 bond.
Lawyers for the officers said the use of lethal force was warranted because Brooks resisted arrest, assaulted both officers, took one officer's Taser and then fired it at the other officer while trying to flee.
Howard told the Daily Report on Wednesday his office "proactively" sent grand jury subpoenas "in the hopes" that a grand jury would convene once the current statewide judicial emergency expires Sunday. Earlier this week, the chief justice announced he will extend the judicial emergency and continue grand jury suspensions through Aug. 12.
On Thursday, Howard issued a second statement blaming the investigator who sent the subpoena for Rolfe's police records, saying he "was under the impression that the March/April grand jury was still impaneled" even though it had been discharged. Howard said his staff will suspend issuing future grand jury subpoenas until grand juries are impaneled, and that he has withdraw the subpoena seeking Rolfe's records.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 2Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 3DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
- 4'Younger and Invigorated Bench': Biden's Legacy in New Jersey Federal Court
- 5'Every Single Judge on Board': First-Impression Case Revived
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250