Where two halves of a deadlocked board are competing in a proxy contest, can one half assert the corporation’s privilege against the other? In In re Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, C.A. No. 2022-0127-LWW, (Del. Ch. May 5, 2022), Vice Chancellor Lori Will concluded that it could not. The even division of the board meant that neither side could benefit from the company’s resources, including its privilege, to the exclusion of the other.

The background of the dispute was somewhat unusual. Disagreements among members of the board had developed over a potential merger agreement with Lockheed Martin. Defendant Drake, a board member and CEO, accused another board member, plaintiff Lichtenstein, the company’s executive chairman, of plotting to remove her so the Company could solicit other bidders allegedly to benefit Lichtenstein financially. To address the accusations, the board appointed a nonmanagement committee to investigate. Meantime, the FTC sued to block the Lockheed merger. The board, fearing that the merger would not close and cognizant of the approaching deadline for submitting director nominations, tried to agree on a slate of nominees but was unsuccessful.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]