January 03, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd
C066518
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment of conviction. The court held that the so-called “prescription defense” to a charge of possessing and/or transporting a controlled substance was available only to the individual for whom the prescription was written and could not be used by someone acting on the prescription holder’s behalf.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
