January 03, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
C.A. 3rd
C066518
The Third Appellate District affirmed a judgment of conviction. The court held that the so-called “prescription defense” to a charge of possessing and/or transporting a controlled substance was available only to the individual for whom the prescription was written and could not be used by someone acting on the prescription holder’s behalf.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
