Like many shareholders, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) got to cast advisory say-on-pay proxy votes last year. And for nearly a quarter of its holdings, the fund gave them a thumbs down. In January, ­CalSTRS released a report that offers companies insight into why some made the grade—and why some didn’t.

The report is of particular interest because CalSTRS, the country’s second-largest public pension system, with nearly $145 billion in assets, wields very big thumbs. And few institutional investors have explained their votes the way CalSTRS did in “Lessons Learned: The Inaugural Year of Say-on-Pay.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]