WASHINGTON — In the past five years, written or verbal communications that threaten, harass or make unsettling overtures to federal judges and others protected by the U.S. Marshalls Service (USMS) have increased by 89%, and threats via the Internet are also increasing.

Michael Prout, assistant director for judicial security within the USMS, recently provided the data to the U.S. Sentencing Commission which is looking into sentencing guidelines under the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007. The commission sought input on whether current guidelines are adequate as they apply to offenses under the act.

The USMS, according to Prout, is concerned with two criminal provisions of the 2007 act: 18 U.S.C. 115 and 18 U.S.C. 119, particularly with respect to violations that occur through the use of the Internet.

The first section, 18 U.S.C. 115, prohibits threatening a federal official to influence, impede or retaliate against a federal official who is performing official duties. This statute specifically mentions the federal judiciary. The 2007 act increased the statutory maximum penalty for this crime to 10 years, except that imprisonment for a threatened assault cannot exceed six years.

The second section, 18 U.S.C. 119, is a new law that makes it illegal to intentionally release personal restricted information, such as a home address or Social Security number, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence to a covered person, such as a judge, assistant U.S. attorney, federal law enforcement officer or a member of their family. Violations of this section are punishable by imprisonment of up to five years.

The USMS has two categories of communications:

♦ Threats — defined as an inappropriate interest, circumstance or event that causes, or could potentially cause, damage to a target whether it is a person, location or specific event. A threat may be communicated in writing, verbally or through a third party.

♦ Inappropriate communications — any communication in writing, by telephone, verbally, through an informant, or by some suspicious activity that threatens, harasses, shows an unusual direction of interest, or makes unsettling overtures of an improper nature directed to a protectee.

Prout said a threat is always an inappropriate communication, but an inappropriate communication is not always a threat.

“For the purpose of this report, we defined ‘through the use of the Internet’ as writings or other information posted on an Internet website or blog,” he said. “We consider these threats to be more serious than written communications sent solely via e-mail. In terms of impact to the victim, and the potential to incite others, we do not consider a communication sent via e-mail to be much different than communication sent via regular mail.

“On the other hand, we view inappropriate communications and threats made via Internet postings and blogs very differently than other delivery method,” he added. “Unlike a letter or an e-mail, comments posted on an Internet Web site have the potential to be viewed by a countless number of persons. Internet postings that are hyper-critical and contain restricted personal information of the protectee, such as a home address or Social Security number, can create a large number of potential threateners virtually unknown to the USMS.”

Prout reported the following breakdown of inappropriate communications (ICs) by fiscal year:

FY 2003 674 total ICs received (no further breakdown available)
FY 2004 873 total ICs received (no further breakdown available)
FY 2005 943 total ICs received (no further breakdown available)
FY 2006

1,111 total ICs received
• 651 ICs received via written method of delivery
• 12 ICs received via Internet posting or blog (1.0% of total ICs)

FY 2007

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
July 11, 2024
New York, NY

The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.


Learn More
October 24, 2024
Georgetown, Washington D.C.

The National Law Journal honors attorneys & judges who've made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in the D.C. area.


Learn More
July 22, 2024 - July 24, 2024
Lake Tahoe, CA

GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.


Learn More

Cullen and Dykman is seeking an associate attorney with a minimum of 5+ years in insurance coverage experience as well as risk transfer and ...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a midlevel insurance coverage associate for its Newark, NJ and/or Philadelphia, PA offices. ...


Apply Now ›

McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...


Apply Now ›
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›

Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.

Surveys & Rankings
National Law Journal