The former administrator of Bell, Calif., who pleaded no contest last week to embezzlement, plans to seek reconsideration of a California appellate ruling that the city is not required to pay for his legal defense.
Against a suit originally brought by California’s attorney general, Robert Rizzo sought a declaratory ruling that, under his 1996 employment contract, the city was obligated to provide him with a legal defense in both the various civil and criminal actions brought against him.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
