Parody has long played an important role in intellectual property law and in intellectual property litigation. It should be no surprise, therefore, that parody issues arise with respect to the Internet,1 and that over the years courts have issued a number of significant decisions involving claims of parody and the Web.2
Earlier this year, The New York Times reported on a court battle over a website parody of a website operated by Koch Industries Inc., a corporation that describes itself as “one of the largest private companies in the world” and that owns multiple companies involved in a wide variety of industries, including oil, coal, chemicals, fibers, pollution control equipment, forest and consumer products, and commodity trading.3 At the heart of the litigation was the tension between the enforcement under federal law of trademark rights, on the one hand, and free speech concerns on the other.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
