Allegheny County will have to find out through the normal course of litigation if its real property assessment system is constitutional after the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected a petition to exercise its King’s Bench or extraordinary jurisdiction over the case.
The Allegheny County Council, through its counsel John F. Cambest of Dodaro Matta & Cambest in Pittsburgh, had asked Pennsylvania’s high court to formulate a test to determine when a property assessment framework violates the uniformity clause of the state constitution, according to the petition in Clifton v. Allegheny County .
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
