An expert’s overnight change in his report was a proper cause for nonsuit even though the plaintiff’s lawyer had not completed his case, a Philadelphia judge has ruled in a brain cancer case, according to an opinion released last month.
The plaintiff in Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co. alleges her husband’s brain cancer was caused by exposure to a Rohm and Haas chemical, vinyl chloride, manufactured by an Illinois plant and then allegedly negligently stored at the plant.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
