Several mortgage lenders are seeking reargument in the state Superior Court after the court ruled in a trio of cases that their foreclosure notices were deficient.
The three-judge panel of Senior Judge Robert E. Colville, Judge John L. Musmanno and Judge Christine Donohue said in all three cases that the mortgage lenders failed to comply with the notice requirements of Act 91, or the state Homeowner’s Emergency Mortgage Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
