A deeply divided en banc Commonwealth Court has ruled that an in camera review by the state’s Office of Open Records may be necessary in situations where an agency’s affidavits are insufficient to show that records are exempt under the state’s Right-to-Know Law.
The panel directed the OOR to conduct an in camera review to determine whether portions of Governor Tom Corbett’s calendars that were redacted before being made public were exempt from disclosure under the RTKL’s exception for records that reflect predecisional deliberations.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
