The attorney representing a man who pled guilty to third-degree murder in 2011 was not ineffective for advising him to do so, despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated mandatory minimum sentences of life without parole for juveniles on constitutional grounds the following year.
Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas Judge Robert L. Steinberg noted as a procedural matter that Angel Rivera’s petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Relief Act was untimely, denying it in turn. But the judge went on to address the merits of the man’s claim in concluding that Rivera’s trial counsel could not be faulted for failing to anticipate the high court’s seminal ruling in Miller v. Alabama.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
