Asserting a political persecution claim is not always a safe bet for a litigant who wants to win asylum before a United States immigration court. However, having a pro bono lawyer like Cam Barker who properly frames that argument increases the odds, as Khagendra Sharma recently found out.
The background to Sharma's claim, according to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal's Aug. 26 decision in Khagendra Sharma v. Eric H. Holder, is as follows.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
