Clydes and DACB eye up Sedgwick London office ahead of US firm's dissolution
Suitors emerge for US firm's 13-lawyer City base ahead of January closure
November 23, 2017 at 07:51 AM
5 minute read
Clyde & Co and DAC Beachcroft are in the running to take on Sedgwick's London office, after the US firm announced that it will close for business early next year.
The London office, which houses 13 lawyers, including six partners, operates as a separate limited liability partnership to the US arm of the firm. It is is led by insurance partner Edward Smerdon, who is also an at-large member of Sedgwick's executive committee.
Multiple sources with knowledge of the matter said that interest in taking on the London team had been registered by both Clydes and DAC Beachcroft, and that Clydes had held talks at least three weeks ago.
Clydes is also understood to be in talks to take on teams of Sedgwick lawyers in the US, where the San Francisco-based firm has offices in Chicago, Dallas, Kansas, Los Angeles, Miami, New Jersey, New York, Seattle and Orange County.
In a statement, Clydes said: "As with all major businesses, we continuously study our markets for opportunities and, at any given time, we may be in discussion with a number of individuals, teams or firms. As a matter of policy we never comment on such discussions until it is appropriate to do so." DAC Beachcroft declined to comment.
News of Clydes and DACB's interest in Sedgwick's London team comes after the firm's announcement that it would wind down its business ahead of a closure in early January. The decision follows a stream of partner departures and office closures in Washington DC, Austin, Fort Lauderdale and Houston.
The firm's headcount has been slashed by 39% over twelve months, leaving it with fewer than 160 lawyers, according to data complied by ALM Legal Intelligence. Six partners from the firm's New York and Chicago have recently joined Kennedys, including New York and Chicago managing partners John Blancett and Eric Scheiner.
Sedgwick's dissolution could be the start of a long and costly ordeal for its former partners and, potentially, the law firms where they resume their careers, according to Legal Week sister title The American Lawyer.
Any mass hire of Sedgwick lawyers could be carried out in a similar manner to Blank Rome's February 2016 addition of 100 lawyers from Dickstein Shapiro, according to industry sources.
In that deal, Blank Rome avoided assuming the failing firm's debts, while absorbing the accounts receivable of some of Dickstein Shapiro's top billers. That deal has so far avoided being publicly contested by former Dickstein Shapiro partners who may still use the courts to regain lost capital, according to one legal industry source familiar with the deal.
While any mass hire of Sedgwick lawyers is likely to be smaller than the size of Blank Rome's mass acquisition, one potential complication for the firm is the number of rainmakers who have already left the firm in the past year who are owed capital. Adding to that complication is a capital contribution policy at the firm that required more money from the highest-paid partners, as described to The American Lawyer by a source familiar with Sedgwick's finances.
Sedgwick required equity partners to contribute capital equal to 50%-55% of their highest annual compensation. New partners were given two years to pay their total capital requirement, and partners who earned a boost in compensation in any year were required to up their capital account in the same year, the source said. For departing partners, the firm paid out capital contributions over 36 months.
It is unclear if Sedgwick has been making those payments. But either way, the firm's obligation has been rapidly growing. The firm has seen around 50 partners leave the firm over the last 12 months, although it is unlikely that all were equity partners.
One purported benefit for a law firm of requiring a large capital account is that it can encourage partners to stay at the firm and also to fight to save it during a downturn. But there is also a significant downside.
"A lot of people are going to lose a lot of money," said one legal industry source.
If Sedgwick is unable to avoid a formal bankruptcy filing, departed partners who have received capital payments or salary in the past 18 months could be the target of a bankruptcy trustee.
In the case of now-defunct Dewey & LeBoeuf, a group of dozens of partners eventually agreed to pay a total of $71m in capital and salary to settle claims with a bankruptcy trustee. Some partners opted out of that settlement, and at least three former partners eventually filed for bankruptcy as a result of debts incurred by the firm's demise.
One former equity partner at Sedgwick who left the firm earlier this year described his time at Sedgwick as "expensive."
"I'm just trying to put that whole experience out of my mind," the former partner said.
DAC Beachcroft declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
The EU Top 30, 2024: Ranking the Largest Law Firms in the European Union by Headcount
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ed Sheeran Meets Led Zeppelin in the Second Circuit
- 2You Too Can Be a Programmer: How Generative AI Can Upskill Any E-Discovery Professional to Write Code
- 3Is Arbitration Working?
- 4New Battleground: Wall Street Law Firms Eye London Growth
- 5Standstill: Court Defers to Legislature on Texas Healthcare
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250