There are some things that just don’t seem to go out of style, like a little black dress, or, in the e-discovery world, a panel of judges reviewing discovery case law.

(l-r) Allison A. Grounds, eMerge managing partner, Troutman Pepper; Judge Willie J. Epps Jr.; Western District of Missouri; Judge Allison H. Goddard, Southern District of California; Judge Gary R. Jones, Northern District of Florida; Judge Young B. Kim, Northern District of Illinois; Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, Eastern District of Texas; Judge Michael Robinson, North Carolina State Court. (Courtesy photo)

During the “Navigating the Legal Landscape: A Comprehensive Case Law Update for Advanced eDiscovery” session at the Georgetown University Law Center’s annual Advanced eDiscovery Institute conference on Thursday, a panel of judges unpacked some of the year’s most notable discovery case law outcomes. They shared takeaways ranging from the appropriate level of granularity that ESI protocols should accomplish, to the challenges that collaboration platforms will create for relevancy redaction debates.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]