Ex-Skadden Associate Gets 30-Day Jail Sentence for Lying to Mueller's Team
Alexander van der Zwaan, a former associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, was sentenced Tuesday to 30 days in jail for lying to the special counsel team investigating Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
April 03, 2018 at 11:47 AM
4 minute read
Former Skadden associate Alex Van der Zwaan, left, arrives for his sentencing at federal court in Washington on April 3, 2018 with his lawyer William Schwartz of Cooley. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJ
Alexander van der Zwaan, a former associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, was sentenced Tuesday to 30 days in jail for repeatedly lying to the special counsel team investigating Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Van der Zwaan, 33, pleaded guilty in February to a single charge that he lied about past communications with former Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates and an unnamed Ukrainian associate of Paul Manafort, the former Trump campaign chairman. Van der Zwaan apologized in court Tuesday, saying: “What I did was wrong.”
Skadden last year fired van der Zwaan, a senior associate in the firm's London office. Van der Zwaan, represented by a defense team from Cooley LLP, has been cooperating with Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.
“The career that he built has turned to dust,” Mark Crofskey, a former Skadden lawyer and van der Zwaan friend, told U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in a letter. “He keenly feels the loss of this hard won career, as well as the loss of his many colleagues and clients.”
Van der Zwaan's lawyers had urged Jackson to impose no jail time as punishment. Cooley partner William Schwartz told the court that van der Zwaan's “professional life has been destroyed,” and that he is likely to lose his U.K. solicitor's license.
Van der Zwaan faced zero to six months in jail, according to court papers. His sentencing hearing Tuesday lasted more than 90 minutes.
Mueller's team did not recommend any sentence but argued against van der Zwaan's push for leniency. The special counsel's office noted that van der Zwwan was represented by “experienced legal counsel” and was himself trained at a “major international law firm.” Van der Zwaan was a Skadden lawyer for ten years before he was terminated.
“While there might eventually be additional professional consequences that befall a foreign lawyer who commits a United States felony, those consequences do not themselves obviate the need for his current sentence to reflect the seriousness of his crime, to promote respect for the law, or to provide adequate specific and general deterrence,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memo.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi / NLJThe 30-day jail sentence imposed on van der Zwaan was the first punishment handed down for charges arising from the special counsel's investigation. Van der Zwaan was also ordered to pay a $20,000 fine and serve two months of supervised release.
Jackson refused van der Zwaan's request to just pay a fine for lying to Mueller team. “We're not talking about a traffic ticket,” she said.
Gates, along with Trump's first national security advisor, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, and former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos have each pleaded guilty to charges stemming from Mueller's investigation.
No sentencing dates have been set for Gates, represented by Thomas Green of Sidley Austin, and Flynn, represented by Covington & Burling's Robert Kelner. The Chicago firm Breen & Pugh is representing Papadopoulos.
Van der Zwaan, in his efforts to help Mueller's team access work and personal devices, offered his fingerprint and, at the request of prosecutors, gave Apple Inc. permission to try to recover information from a damaged iPhone.
“The conduct that brings Alex before this court was inexcusable,” his lawyers wrote in a sentencing memo to the court. “And while his actions following his initial meeting with the OSC cannot absolve him from culpability, they are compelling mitigating factors in considering just punishment.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readPresidential Immunity Doesn't Block Trump's NY Criminal Prosecution, Judge Rules
DC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readJustices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250