How DC Firms Stack Up in the Am Law 100
All in all, it was a strong revenue year for big law firms in Washington and beyond.
April 24, 2018 at 03:12 PM
3 minute read
The 2018 Am Law 100 rankings of the country's highest-grossing law firms are finally here, and once again Washington, D.C., has held its own on the list—including both D.C.-founded firms and others with a strong center of gravity in the city.
See Also: The 2018 Am Law 100
Washington's homegrown firms grew their revenue and remained competitive at a time when market consolidation and political turmoil created uncertainty for lawyers everywhere to tap.
The country's growing economy also served firms well in 2017, with the gross revenue threshold to crack the top 100 rising to $349 million in this year's rankings.
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer was 36th in the 2018 rankings, with $951.5 million in gross revenue in 2017. Legacy Arnold & Porter ranked 55th in 2016, before its merger with Kaye Scholer.
Covington & Burling improved three places to 37 on this year's list, one spot behind Arnold & Porter. Covington, which expanded into the United Arab Emirates and South Africa last year, saw its gross revenues rise by $100 million. Covington's international growth has continued in 2018, as it absorbed a German firm last month.
A pair of firms in the second 50 slid in the rankings, with Crowell & Moring falling from 75 to 82 and Steptoe & Johnson LLP dropping two spots from 94 to 96. Crowell & Moring saw its revenue slip 3.6 percent, to $418.7 million, but still showed positive five-year trend data in revenues and profits. Steptoe's revenues grew 3.7 percent last year, to $368.9 million, but a strong performance from other top firms made the firm one of the final five to make the cut.
Michael McKenney, D.C. managing director of Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group, told The National Law Journal in February that Washington had cemented its reputation in 2017 as a “destination market” for big firms, with one of its best years since the onset of the financial crisis in 2007.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand, Uncertainty
'Everybody Is Holding Their Breath': Big Law Lobbying Businesses See Mixed Earnings in Q3
3 minute readAre Lead Attorney Relationships More Important Now Than Law Firm Brands?
7 minute readKramer Levin Hires Ex-Special Counsel to President Biden, Among Latest DC Firm News
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250