At 'Megabank' Hearing, Freshman Rep. Katie Porter Takes on Jamie Dimon—and His $31M Salary
The California Democrat and law school professor has shown a unique confrontation style, giving plenty of discussion points for white-collar and congressional lawyers preparing clients. Wednesday's hearing was no exception.
April 10, 2019 at 04:14 PM
6 minute read
With the CEO of Equifax, U.S. Rep. Katie Porter whipped out a stack of documents as she called attention to the company's court argument that a devastating 2017 data breach had not harmed any consumers.
With Tim Sloan, at the time the CEO of Wells Fargo, Porter came prepared with a poster board highlighting language in which the bank's lawyers appeared to dismiss the executive's statements about restoring consumer trust in the aftermath of the fraudulent account scandal. The poster board, featuring blown-up text from a court filing, displayed a line in which the lawyers described his past statements as “paradigmatic examples of non-actionable corporate puffery, on which no reasonable investor could rely.”
On Wednesday, at a hearing featuring seven top executives of the country's biggest banks, including Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Brian Moynihan at Bank of America, Porter arrived with a new weapon of choice: a whiteboard, on which she planned to calculate the income and expenses of an entry-level bank employee.
The planned presentation—”showtime,” according to one white-collar defender who was following the action—drew a rebuke from a Republican colleague. Porter would agree to put it down shortly after beginning her questioning, disarmed by the House Financial Services Committee's top Republican, Rep. Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, who said she had not cleared the visual aid in advance in accordance with the committee's standard practice.
Still, Porter made her point.
Drawing from the hourly wage listed on an online job posting, along with average housing costs and a minimal food budget, Porter painted a picture of a low-level JPMorgan Chase employee supporting a 6-year-old daughter in Irvine, California. At the $16.50 hourly wage she said she found on a Monster.com posting, the mother would face at least a $567 shortfall each month after taxes and expenses, Porter calculated.
“My question for you, Mr. Dimon, is, how should she manage this budget shortfall while she's working full time at your bank?” Porter asked.
“I don't know that all your numbers are accurate. That number is generally a starter job. You can get those jobs out of high school, and she may have my job one day,” Dimon said.
“She may,” Porter replied. “But, Mr. Dimon, she doesn't have the ability right now to spend your $31 million.”
Porter's use of court filings at previous hearings confronted the sincerity of the executives testifying at the House Financial Services committee. Wednesday's theme was inequality, an issue the corporate executives had prepared to address in the lead-up to the hearing.
Although Porter did not spotlight court documents, her questions were otherwise in line with her past approach: leading executives down a path to a public stumble, with preparation and research fueling the fire under the hearing room hot seat.
The tactic has put Porter, a professor on leave from the University of California-Irvine School of Law, firmly on the minds of lawyers who specialize in preparing executives for congressional hearings. Bloomberg reported that Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr was hired by four banks—Citigroup, Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon and State Street—to advise their leaders. Davis Polk & Wardwell worked with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley ahead of the hearing, according to the report.
Dimon told Porter on Wednesday he was fully sympathetic to the plight of the hypothetical JPMorgan employee who can't make ends meet.
“She's short $567. What do you suggest she do?” Porter asked.
“I don't know. I'd have to think about that.”
“Would you recommend she take out a JPMorgan Chase credit card and run a deficit?”
“I don't know. I'd have to think about that,” Dimon repeated.
“Would you recommend that she overdraft at your bank and be charged overdraft fees?”
“I don't know. I'd have to think about it,” Dimon said a third time.
“I'd love to call her up and have a conversation about her financial affairs and see if we could be helpful,” Dimon added.
Porter turned her attention next to Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, asking him whether he knew the Earth's population. He correctly answered it was almost 7 billion. Porter wanted to hear more about the Goldman Sachs “10,000 Women” initiative to provide business skills to women around the globe.
“So let's assume half of those are women. … And Goldman Sachs' big initiative is to help 10,000 of them. Is this initiative missing a few zeros?” Porter asked.
“It's an initiative we started over 10 years ago to try to help women in developing economies where they didn't have access to resources,” Solomon said.
“It's been very successful,” he continued. “We've now expanded it. We've put the programs up online, and we continue to invest in it. We'll certainly consider whether or not we can broaden it. But I think it's an excellent program, and we'll use our resources to expand it.”
With that, Porter turned her microphone away. Her five minutes were up.
Still, after the hearing, Porter would make use of her whiteboard.
“During my questioning, [JPMorgan] CEO Jamie Dimon said he didn't know if all my numbers were accurate,” Porter tweeted, with a photograph of her calculation scribbled in red and white marker. “Here's the math so he can check.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute readNY Antitrust Investigators Seek Subpoena in Probe of Potential Capital One-Discover Merger
Financial Services Has a Trust Problem. Can GCs Help Right the Ship?
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250