Abolish patent rights. Grant IP waivers. Open COVID-19 intellectual property. The development of COVID-19 vaccines has elicited very real fears of unequal access—and with it, a growing call to waive intellectual property enforcement for these lifesaving drugs. However, while legal mechanisms like compulsory licensing hold some promise in addressing these concerns, these proposals oversimplify and ignore crucial non-IP challenges to the effective delivery of COVID-19 vaccines, such as infrastructure disparities and lack of a fully functioning public health system.
The United States conceptualizes patents as private property: government-sanctioned monopolies without any obligation to practice the invention. An inventor who secures a patent may commercialize, license or do nothing at all with her patent. Even if she does nothing herself, she may still assert her rights to prevent others from commercializing it. These deadweight losses created by patents are justified on the basis that full public disclosure of the invention is sufficient as a public good. Ostensibly, a 20-year exclusivity period incentivizes innovation. In the pharmaceutical industry, monopoly profits ostensibly offset the high costs and risks of bringing a drug to market—between $314 million and $2.8 billion in R&D.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]