Orrick Snags Weil Gotshal's Patent Litigation Co-Chair
Twenty-five year Weil Gotshal veteran (and former Orrick associate) Jared Bobrow joins Tuesday as co-lead of Orrick's global IP practice.
May 21, 2018 at 08:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Jared Bobrow. (Courtesy photo)
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe chairman Mitchell Zuklie believes Silicon Valley is on the cusp of a new wave of IP litigation. Instead of networking and smartphones, the new flash points will likely involve blockchain, artificial intelligence, connected vehicles and virtual reality.
Now Orrick believes it's hired just the IP litigator to help lead the charge in such areas: Jared Bobrow, the co-chair of the patent litigation practice of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, joins Orrick on Tuesday. He will be co-lead of Orrick's global IP practice with partner Sten Jensen.
“There aren't many IP litigators as skilled and experienced as him in the valley,” Zuklie said. “He's a world-class talent and a great cultural fit.”
Bobrow is a 25-year veteran of Weil whose most recent claim to fame was a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling that further fleshed out the U.S. Supreme Court's TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands ruling on patent venue.
He's the latest in a long line of IP litigators who've thrived at Weil Gotshal before moving on to other firms. Bobrow and partner Edward Reines were regarded as Weil's last top rainmaking patent litigators in Silicon Valley, according to a 2015 Recorder story.
Bobrow said Orrick held three attractions for him. The first is the commitment to the technology industry, “no matter what perspective you come at it from: VC, emerging companies, IP litigation, licensing.”
The second is the Asia practice built by Orrick partner Xiang Wang. “The IP disputes that stem from or are related to Asia are only going to increase,” Bobrow said. “Orrick is really well-positioned to take advantage of that.” The third piece is an appellate practice that “to my mind is second to none.”
The move will represent a homecoming for Bobrow. He spent six years as an associate at Orrick before joining Weil Gotshal. A lot of Orrick's personnel has changed over 25 years, particularly in the IP area, but he's looking forward to being reunited with Orrick veterans like Lynne Hermle and Michael Torpey.
Bobrow handles both trials and appeals. In Micron he persuaded the Federal Circuit that the Supreme Court had effectively changed the law of patent venue in its TC Heartland decision such that other parties who had not raised it did not necessarily waive it. That decision sprung Micron from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a patent infringement case brought by Harvard University. Following a claim construction hearing in the District of Delaware the case settled.
Bobrow also is representing Micron Technology Inc. in a series of inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
He and Orrick also have a number of clients in common, including Oracle Corp., Synopsys Inc. and PayPal Holdings Inc.
Zuklie has identified technology as a strategic cornerstone for Orrick along with energy and finance. With IP practice leaders like Gary Weiss and William Anthony retiring in recent years, and trial honcho Chris Ottenweller beginning to step back from practice, the firm has been searching to add someone like Bobrow for a couple of years, Zuklie said. Orrick also lost patent litigator Neel Chatterjee to Goodwin Procter last year.
It's probably not Orrick's last move in the space. “We're not done with our commitment to the sector,” Zuklie said.
Coming along with Bobrow is Weil Gotshal counsel Jason Lang. Lang does IP litigation and counseling, which includes helping clients understand their portfolio and evaluating IP risks. “But he's also a courtroom lawyer,” Bobrow said, adding that Lang had helped argue claim construction for Micron in its dispute with Harvard.
“We wish Jared and Jason the best in their new roles,” Weil Gotshal said in a firm statement.
D.C. partner Brian Ferguson, who had been co-chair of the patent litigation practice with Bobrow, will continue to lead Weil Gotshal's 40 patent litigators, some 80 percent of whom hold technical or scientific degrees, the firm stated.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute read'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250