Harvey Weinstein Arraigned on Rape Charges
The former Hollywood producer is facing multiple sexual assault charges connected to two separate incidents.
May 25, 2018 at 07:48 AM
4 minute read
Former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was arraigned in Manhattan criminal court Friday morning on charges of rape in the first and third degrees, as well as criminal sexual act in the first degree, the New York City Police Department and Manhattan District Attorney's Office said.
The charges stemmed from alleged sexual assaults against two women in separate incidents in 2013 and 2004, the DA's Office said.
In a statement from a police spokesman, the department thanked the “brave survivors” in the case “for their courage to come forward and seek justice.”
In a separate statement, District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. called the charges against Weinstein “significant progress in this active, ongoing investigation.”
Benjamin Brafman of Brafman & Associates, who represents Weinstein, said immediately after the arraignment his client intends to plead not guilty to the charges, calling them “constitutionally flawed.”
He added later in an email he intends to file a motion to dismiss the charges “as being legally flawed and not supported by credible evidence.”
Bail for Weinstein was set at $1 million cash with a $10 million bond alternative, according to the DA's Office. Weinstein will wear a monitoring device as well, and has surrendered his passport. He is restricted to travel within New York and Connecticut, absent approval from prosecutors and the court.
Weinstein's appearance in court followed his voluntary surrender at the 1st Precinct in Lower Manhattan this morning. He arrived at the 1st Precinct shortly before 7:30 a.m., wearing a dark blue sports jacket and a button-down shirt, flanked by two detectives.
Following Weinstein's arraignment, Brafman told reporters that Weinstein has been under investigation for the past seven months, and that the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York has its own investigation underway.
“Mr. Weinstein has always maintained that any sexual activity he engaged in was consensual,” Brafman said, according to a transcript of his remarks after the arraignment. “He has vehemently denied any of the allegations which suggest that he engaged in non-consensual sexual activity. Many of these allegations are long overdue, quite frankly, having been made about events that are alleged to have occurred many years ago.”
Also on Weinstein's defense team is Blair Berk of Tarlow & Berk in West Hollywood, California.
He said that a jury won't be convinced of Weinstein's guilt, “assuming we get 12 fair people who are not consumed by the movement that seems to have overtaken this case.”
Dozens of women have come forward to accuse Weinstein of sexually harassing and assaulting them since The New Yorker published a story detailing allegations against the former movie producer. The publication of the article last year created a cultural upheaval, launching the #MeToo movement, a broader societal and cultural reckoning with the treatment of women by men in positions of power in the workplace and beyond.
The allegations against Weinstein ultimately toppled him from his namesake media production company, but the allegations have had a ripple effect. A 2015 incident involving an Italian model, Ambra Battilana Gutierrez, was believed by some law enforcement officials in New York to justify misdemeanor charges. However, Vance's office declined to prosecute at the time.
The Manhattan DA's Office argued that the evidence was insufficient to prove the crime. However, the decision, which fully came to light in the New Yorker article, resulted in a backlash against Vance, who was accused by some of being too soft on a powerful individual, in an office that routinely prosecutes misdemeanor sex crimes with less evidence.
In the wake of that article, the Manhattan DA's Office ultimately launched an investigation into Weinstein based on separate incidents, which led to the calling of a grand jury.
News of Weinstein's impending arrest first emerged on Thursday.
Andrew Denney and Christine Simmons of the New York Law Journal each contributed reporting to this article.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Why Kramer Levin Decided to Merge
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 3Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 4US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 5Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250