Venable Group Joins Sheppard Mullin, Bringing 'East Coast Real Estate Credentials'
Sheppard Mullin, which had only one real estate partner in Manhattan, has brought on a seven-lawyer group from Venable in New York, including the former head of the practice there.
October 29, 2018 at 04:57 PM
4 minute read
Editor's Note: This article was updated Tuesday with comments from Venable's chairman.
Until recently, Am Law 100 firm Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, based in Los Angeles, only had one real estate partner in New York, the U.S. epicenter of big-money property and finance deals.
For firms based out-of-state, quickly growing in the practice is difficult. Groups of profitable real estate attorneys are hard to transfer. But this month, Sheppard Mullin scored a key lateral group, when it landed seven real estate transactional attorneys from Venable.
The incoming group is led by partner Peter Koffler, formerly chair of Venable's New York real estate practice and vice chair of the firm's national practice in real estate. The group also includes partner Brian Gurtman and Ross Honig, special counsel Julia Geykhman, Robert Gorzelany and Lee Weiss and associate Jared Wachtler.
With the move, Koffler, 56, now leads Sheppard Mullin's New York real estate, land use and environmental practice group.
The attorneys focus on real estate transactions, including acquisitions, sales, leasing, sale and leaseback transactions, construction/development and financings. Clients include commercial developers, owners, and operators and companies with significant real estate holdings, such as insurance companies, banks, mining companies and pension funds.
According to news reports, Koffler's recent deal experience includes representing the seller in the $55 million sale of Hotel Elysee to the hotel's subtenants and representing EmblemHealth in its $330 million sale of its Manhattan property on Ninth Avenue.
Koffler, who worked with a recruiter for the move, said his clients are joining him at Sheppard Mullin.
“There was nothing bad about Venable,” Koffler said, but Sheppard Mullin “is a platform that is going to be more supportive of us, and it's going to help us grow our practice beyond what we could have grown at Venable.”
“The firm is very committed to helping us build our practice,” Koffler said, and Sheppard “provides greater resources to attract and maintain talent.”
Among the differences between the two firms, Venable has eight offices, all inside the U.S., while Sheppard Mullin has 16 offices in North America, Europe and Asia. Meanwhile, Venable reportedly has a different associate bonus structure compared with other firms.
Sheppard Mullin's average profits per equity partner was $1.71 million in 2017, compared with Venable's average at $1.13 million, according to The American Lawyer.
In a statement to ALM on Tuesday, Venable chairman Stuart Ingis said, “We're every bit as competitive as other Am Law firms in how we pay our partners and associates, including bonuses. We have a very well established New York and national real estate practice, which will continue, even with them gone.” He added, “Sheppard Mullin appears willing to pay a premium beyond the market in order to get into a new area – [New York] real estate – where they don't have a practice.”
Koffler, in response Tuesday, said, “The financial terms of our arrangements are confidential.”
The real estate group's departure comes just two months after Venable announced it was absorbing intellectual property boutique Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, effective Nov. 1. The merged firm will have about 800 total attorneys
Koffler said the combination was not a factor in his decision to move.
The group hire instantly provides the Los Angeles-based firm real estate credentials in New York and puts it over 100 attorneys in Manhattan.
“This turnkey group brings outstanding East Coast real estate credentials to our firm,” real estate practice group leader Nancy Scull, based in San Diego, said in a statement.
Now Sheppard Mullin “is on the map” for such practices, Koffler said. “We both have a lot to offer each other,” he said. “This is a starting point, with the goal of becoming one of New York's pre-eminent real estate groups.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250