Plaintiff brought an action on behalf of her infant daughter, alleging medical malpractice by defendant’s staff. The state Supreme Court in Albany granted defendant’s motion to preclude expert testimony and granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, finding that conduct by plaintiff’s trial counsel during expert witness disclosure was willful and contumacious.
That court precluded plaintiff from supporting her medical malpractice claim with expert testimony or with any other evidence that would have been responsive to the defective bill of particulars.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
