Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City. Courtesy photo
"The Borgata excluded me because their thoughts are I am involved in illegal gambling activities or money laundering, and that is not true. Their lawyers are misinformed," said pro se plaintiff Nat Vaughn, a 75-year-old retiree who prevailed in his appeal to the Third Circuit.
August 21, 2019 at 10:10 PM
1 minute read
A federal appeals court partially reinstated a suit against the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa in Atlantic City by a banned patron who the casino claims was misusing slot machine payout vouchers—and who is representing himself.
While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that plaintiff Nat Vaughn’s defamation claim and claims against Borgata owner, MGM Resorts International, were correctly dismissed, his public accommodation claims against Borgata were reinstated and remanded.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
