A snag has developed in the implementation of “Daniel’s Law,” a state statute aimed at protecting the safety of judges and their families.
Records custodians, who respond to requests under the Open Public Records Act for government agencies, say complying with Daniel’s Law is problematic because they have no way of knowing which of the records they oversee correspond to current or former judges and others covered by the law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
