0 results for 'Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP'
Clear Channel Lobbies for Media Ownership Rules Change
Despite the certainty of another high-profile battle with opponents of media consolidation, Clear Channel Communications has quietly floated a plan that would allow the radio giant and other station owners to boost their holdings in the largest U.S. markets. Observers say that satellite radio, iPods and the Internet have all provided new "voices" that should be taken into account by the FCC, particularly in the largest markets, although there is concern that the ownership rules are "untouchable."Mahwah Toxic Dump Litigation Designated as Mass Tort
Notice to the bar.3rd Circuit to Weigh FCC Media Rules
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments today challenging the FCC's controversial media ownership rules. Specifically, the court will consider a motion filed by the Media Access Project, a Washington public interest law firm, requesting that the FCC delay implementing the media rules until a judicial panel considers a consolidated case that encompasses all challenges to the regulations.D.C. Court of Appeals Resurrects Cell Phone Radiation Cases
The D.C. Court of Appeals last week revived a series of lawsuits by individuals who say they were harmed by cell phone radiation, adding yet another wrinkle to a debate within U.S. courts over whether national regulations trump state laws when it comes to issues surrounding cell phone safety. The decision gave both sides of the case fodder to declare victory -- but some lawyers said the ruling could lead to the filing of even more suits against cell phone companies in Washington's trial court.License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)
Notice to the bar.By Buckley, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Marlow, Ellerin, JJ. 5130-5130A Micah Goldberg plf-ap, v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, a Missouri Corporation def-res _____
By Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Ellerin, Nardelli, Marlow, JJ. 4402 Cellular Telephone Company, also known as AT&T Wireless, plf-res, v. 210 East 86th Street Corp., de
Cite as: MBIA Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 10-0355-cv (L), NYLJ 1202499327260, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 1, 2011)Before: Sack, Lynch, C.JJ., and Preska, Ch. D.J
Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now