0 results for 'Steptoe & Johnson LLP'
Aramony v. United Way Replacement Benefit Plan
Publication Date: 1999-09-02 Practice Area: terms & |
conditions
Industry: Court: United States Court of Appeals for The Second Circuit Judge: WINTER, Chief Judge, OAKES, and SACK, Circuit Judges Attorneys: For plaintiff: MICHAEL BAILEY For defendant: PAUL J. ONDRASIK, JR. Case number: Nos. 98-9502, 98-9672
The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. SACK, Circuit Judge: For twenty-two years, William Aramony served as president and chief execut
Voohries-Larson v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
Publication Date: 2001-02-23 Practice Area: products liability
Industry: Court: 9th Cir. Judge: REINHARDT, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce E. Meyerson For defendant: Ronald P. Williams Case number: No. 99-15916
The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: Appellants Linda Voohries-Larson, Betsy Keilen, and Charlene Townsend, the mothers of th
Airlines Strike Back at DOJ Merger Challenge
Publication Date: 2013-09-11 Practice Area: Industry: Court: Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number:
American Airlines and US Airways are pushing back hard against the U.S. Department of Justice, filing court papers blasting the government’s bid to block their pending $11 billion merger.
Final Judgment is in: What Does 'Microsoft' Mean?
While there is a stay and an appeal, there is little denying that U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's June 7 ruling that Microsoft should be broken into two separate companies has changed the Internet business both because of its interpretation of the law and its high profile. Voices ranging from prominent attorneys in the field to politicians weigh in with their opinions on the decision and its likely impact.
County of Santa Clara et al. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (Atlantic Richfield Company)
Publication Date: 2010-07-26 Practice Area: Government
Industry: Court: Ca. Sup. Ct. Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: No. S163681
Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9363COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY,
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 3In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 4Law.com's Top 100 Verdicts of 2023
- 5Insights on M&A Trends: Midyear 2024 Expert Roundtable
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now