0 results for 'Knobbe Martens Olson'
Announcing the Winners and Finalists for the 2023 California Legal Awards
The Recorder is proud to announce this year's winners and finalists for the California Legal Awards, celebrating the achievements of lawyers and companies leading technology, innovation and the profession as a whole.
Companies Should Not Fake It Until They Make It
In this article, Robert Roby discusses the trend of fake reviews and review manipulation in the online shopping world and the recent FTC proposal to address situations in which it believes consumers are being harmed.
High Court's 'Bad Spaniels' Decision Offers Warning to Creators in Commercial Space
"You really have to be amusing" to get parody protection under trademark law, said Knobbe Martens partner Jeff Van Hoosear.
Smaller but Mightier: The 2023 Am Law 200 Outperforms Larger Firms
For the Am Law Second Hundred, 2022 was a great year. They are looking to continue that growth, but is their market-leading performance here to stay?
California's Second Hundred Law Firms Saw Steadier Gains in 2022
The 11 California-founded firms on the Am Law Second Hundred this year benefited from more conservative growth, stabilized midmarket dealmaking, and industry advantages.
Smaller but Mightier: The 2023 Am Law 200 Outperforms Larger Firms
For the Am Law Second Hundred, 2022 was a great year. They are looking to continue that growth, but is their market-leading performance here to stay?
Monster Energy Faces Pro Bono Pushback Against Its Trademark Enforcement Campaign
Attorneys say more pro bono representation and sanctions might turn the tide in cases against serial trademark opposers such as Monster Energy Co.
'Schedule A' Cases: A Powerful Tool for Enforcing Design Patents
This article takes a closer look at such cases in the Northern District of Illinois, the preferred venue for the increasingly popular Schedule A design patent cases.
Another Fresh Batch of Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs
Runners-up include defense lawyers who secured a mid-trial ruling in Connecticut tossing out federal prosecutors' latest attempt to bring criminal antitrust charges related to alleged "no-poach" agreements.
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 3Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 4Future of Litigation: Keeping Pace with the Rapid Rate of Change
- 5A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now