0 results for 'Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz'
Matter of Estate of Hoyte
Publication Date: 2021-04-16 Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Surrogate's Court, Albany Judge: Surrogate Stacy Pettit Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Petitioner: David H. Larkin, Esq., Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf, New York. For defendant: Attorney for Respondent Albany County Department of Social Services: Albert F. Dingley, Esq., Office of the Albany County Attorney, Albany.
Guardian ad litem for Respondent Trennice Hoyte: Robert M. Gottheim, Esq., Albany.
Guardian ad litem for Respondent Harryson Hoyte: Patricia J. Shevy, Esq., Albany. Case number: 2014-711/A
DSS Precluded From Entitlement to Share in Net Settlement Proceeds by Supreme Court Order
Appellate Division, Second Department: February 10, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-02-16 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: February 10, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department:February 2, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-02-04 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:February 2, 2021
Cross-Examination: Exploring the Process That Leads to the Choice
In every case, someone makes a choice that gives rise to the claim. For the attorney conducting a cross-examination of the person or persons who made the choice, dissecting the thought process that led to that choice will provide fodder for cross-examination and lead to success in the courtroom. In this edition of their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan explore Question and Answer techniques for eliciting useful responses.
Appellate Division, Second Department:November 12, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-11-16 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Handdown List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department:November 12, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department:November 5, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-11-09 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeal(s) & Motion(s) Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:November 5, 2020
Impeachment: Let's Go to the Video Tape
In their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan write: Whether in the form of a deposition, surveillance footage or an event captured on a nearby security camera, the trial lawyer must think carefully how to best exploit a video as a strategic tool for helping her win the case before ever questioning a witness. If used properly, a video can serve to leave an indelible impression that there is no doubt that the witness is a liar, cannot be trusted and is anything but credible.
Jury's $60M Verdict in 'Agonizing' High School Student Burn Case Upheld
As a chemistry teacher at Manhattan's Beacon High School "poured methanol from a gallon jug" into dishes containing nitrates, "a giant fireball erupted ... and engulfed" the student, and he burned for at least a minute, wrote the judge.
Appellate Division, Second Department:July 1, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-07-06 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department:July 1, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department:December 10, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-12-12 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:December 10, 2019
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Law.com's Top 100 Verdicts of 2023
- 3Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 4In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 5Updated Stanford Report Finds High Hallucination Rates on Westlaw AI
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now