0 results for ''Babst Calland Clements''
Court: Pending Ordinance Doctrine Does Not Apply to Land Development Applications
These MPC mandated procedures require municipalities to obtain recommendations from their local planning bodies, submit proposed zoning ordinances and amendments to the relevant county planning agency, and to hold public hearings to solicit public comment.PLW People in the News—Dec. 20, 2022—Babst Calland, Barley Snyder
Devlin E. Carey recently joined Babst Calland as an associate in the litigation group.Environmental Liability Transfers: Buyer and Seller Perspectives
Commonly known as an environmental liability transfer, these transactions generally involve the purchaser acquiring the real property and other assets associated with an industrial facility and assuming responsibility for all environmental liabilities associated with that property, including site closure, demolition and environmental remediation obligations.PLW People in the News—Dec. 6, 2022—Babst Calland, Tucker Arensberg
Attorneys Susanna Bagdasarova and Joseph A. Pope recently joined law firm Babst, Calland, Clements and Zomnir in its Pittsburgh office.View more book results for the query "'Babst Calland Clements'"
Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Remote Worker and the FMLA's 50/75 Rule
Navigating the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in the COVID era, including the pandemic-related amendments, has felt like a minefield for many employers. Now that the surge of COVID-related uses of FMLA leave has largely passed, a new aspect of statutory compliance is emerging as a hot-button issue: treatment of remote workers under the FMLA.Hogan Lovells Backs Pa. NAACP In Voting Rights Suit
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.PLW People in the News—Oct. 25, 2022—Barley Snyder, Babst Calland
Barley Snyder continues to grow and expand its group of attorneys, as the firm has hired two new associates, Tasha R. Stoltzfus Nankerville and Charmaine E. Nyman.Commonwealth Court Finds Proposed Sale of Unused Park Land Violates the DDPA
Recently, in the case of In re Township of Jackson, 280 A.3d 1074 (Pa. Cmwlth, 2022), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court revisited several seminal cases interpreting the DDPA to consider whether the orphan's court had properly denied the petition of Jackson Township, Lebanon County, to sell a parcel donated to the township for use as a public park.PADEP's RACT III Rule Requires Action From Major Sources of NOx and VOCs
The Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board (EQB) will soon publish amendments to the Department of Environmental Protection's (PADEP) regulations in 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129 for all major stationary sources of nitrogen oxides (NOx) or volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, commonly known as the RACT III rule.Trending Stories
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now