0 results for 'Snell & Wilmer'
MKJA, Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLC
Publication Date: 2011-01-04 Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry: Court: C.A. 4th Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Alexander M. Schack, Alexander M. Schack, Geoffrey J. Spreter and Amanda R. Moreno for Plaintiffs and Respondents. For defendant: Snell & Wilmer, Christopher Brent Pinzon, Todd E. Lundell, Elizabeth M. Weldon and Scott E. Sandberg for Defendants and Appellants Ochoa, Goshon, Shukla, Smith, Schaden and 123 Fit Franchising, LLC.
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicer, Marc Victor Allaria, James Stankowski and Robert Cooper for Defendants and Appellants Severy and Stopp. Case number: No. D055967
Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 250MKJA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. 123 FIT FRANCHISING, LLC et al., Defe
Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
Notice to the bar.IPO Pipeline Pumps Cash Into Coffers for Latham, Other Am Law 200 Firms
Latham & Watkins, Simpson Thacher, Davis Polk, and Fenwick & West are leading a pack of firms reaping the benefits from a recent round of initial public offerings that includes share sales for such companies as Fairway, SeaWorld, Taminco, and Taylor Morrison.Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
Notice to the bar.Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
Notice to the bar.
Getting Fired: Don't Deal With the In-House Counsel and Deal With It Publicly?
Heaven forbid, IF you get fired, don't talk with the in-house counsel and deal with it in a public manner? Uh oh, that's not what an in-house lawyer wants to hear ...A Nice Place to Try a Case -- and More
Lessons about the physical courtroom of the future are in high demand these days. In California, a committee of the Judicial Council guided by a team of architects is in the middle of the most extensive survey of court facilities ever undertaken in any state. The end result, due in 2002, will be a massive report describing what must be done to Calif.'s trial and appellate facilities to bring them up to snuff. At the top of court planners' to-do lists is accommodating new technology.
Hovanec v. Van Nuys Airport Restaurant Corp.
Publication Date: 1999-12-03 Practice Area: labor law |
wrongful termination
Industry: Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California Judge: Vogel and Curry Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephan Math For defendant: Baron, et al. Case number: No. B122779
The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.INTRODUCTION Plaintiff and appellant Linda Hovanec appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered afte
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 3In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 4A Novel (and 'Funnier') Ranking System for Law Schools: How Many Mentions in the Times
- 5Insights on M&A Trends: Midyear 2024 Expert Roundtable
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now