The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday sharply limited the reach of a federal law used to hold corporations and others accountable for human rights abuses committed abroad. But human rights lawyers predicted additional litigation over how much of the federal courthouse door was left ajar.

By Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny, JJ. 4939 Semi-Tech Litigation, L.L.C., etc., Plaintiff-res-ap, v. James H. Ting def-ap, Michael List de

U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Sweet On June 16, 2003, plaintiff Capitol Records, Inc. ("Capitol") provided supplemental evidentiary submissio

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. GRABER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are three insurance companies and one trade organization

New York, Supreme Court New York Law Journal

Viacom International is getting a second shot at proving that YouTube massively infringed its copyrights by hosting clips from shows like "The Daily Show" and "Family Guy" without its permission. And whether Viacom and its lawyers succeed or not, they've already managed to shape the developing case law over copyrighted content that users illegally upload to the Internet.