0 results for 'McCarter & English'
Marijuana in Highland Park: Lawyers Have Doubts About New Suit
"I think that upholding the supremacy of marijuana scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act is a weak argument," attorney Ryan Magee said. "And it gets weaker by the day."Law Firm Proves Judgment Correct in Malpractice Claim
Official misconduct conviction reversed where trial court delayed in recognizing legal insufficiency of procurement law violation charge, thereby allowing jury to hear evidence on the procurement charge that could have spilled over into the jury's consideration of the official misconduct charge.
Court found that coverage exclusion in defendants' insurance tower for insured's securities action was not triggered where prior SEC subpoena was, at best, tangentially related to the action as the subpoena and the action focused on two different types of alleged improper conduct.
View more book results for the query "McCarter & English"
Case to Proceed Against McCarter & English
Both parties agreed that legal malpractice has a three-year statute of limitations, while breach-of-contract claims have a six-year statute of limitations.Fired Associate Says It's Not Easy Being a Conservative in Big Law
"If the legal community's going to cancel out diverse perspectives, that's not the right way. And that's what ... happened to me," former McCarter & English associate William D. Brown Jr. said.FTX Investors Claim Sullivan & Cromwell 'Aided' and Encouraged Fraud
S&C has generated $180 million "or 10% of the total revenue the 900-lawyer firm publicly stated it collected in all of 2022," according to a new lawsuit by FTX investors.McCarter & English Punitive Damages Question to Be Argued Before State High Court
State and federal trial courts have split on whether punitive damages are available for contract claims outside of the insurance context, according to a recent ruling from U.S. District Judge Michael Shea of the District of Connecticut.Judge Rejects Class Action Claim Filed Against Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Sanofi-Aventis
"Plaintiffs have not sufficiently shown they failed to receive the benefit of the bargain as they have not alleged that they had 'a reasonable belief about the product induced by a misrepresentation'—and in fact they have asserted the opposite, that their ascertainable loss theory is not based on misrepresentation—or that they were misled into buying insulin that was worth less than was promised," Judge Brian R. Martinotti said.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now