0 results for 'Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP'
Sentence Reduction, Question of Standing, TILA Liability
In this edition of their Eastern District Roundup, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan report on several recent and significant representative decisions, including reduction of a lengthy prison sentence due to defendant's medical impairments; a holding that, under ERISA, unionized workers had standing to sue trustees of their former union regarding dollar amounts transferred to their new union; and a holding that plaintiffs failed to establish a bank's liability under the Truth in Lending Act regarding disclosures related to their mortgage.U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Have Not Kept Pace With the Use of Technology. It's Time To Change Them.
Anachronistic and vaguely defined provisions that have been updated to reflect today's business and technological landscape can lead to aberrant results.Appeals & Motions List released on:June 28, 2022
Appeals & Motions List released on:June 16, 2022
COVID Release and Motion To Vacate Denied, Permission To Amend Reversed
In this edition of their Eastern District Roundup, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan report on several recent and significant representative decisions, including denial of a prisoner's application for compassionate release based on COVID concerns; denial of plaintiffs' motion to vacate a judgment against them, dismissing their claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act; and reversal of a decision permitting a debtor to amend her complaint.View more book results for the query "Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP"
Appeals &Motions List released on:June 2, 2022
Appeals &Motions List released on:May 12, 2022
Vaccinated Jury, Counsel Conflict, Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
In this edition of their Eastern District Roundup, Harvey M. Stone and Richard H. Dolan report on several significant decisions, including: a denial of defendants' motions for a new trial based on the court's decision to seat only jurors who had been vaccinated against COVID-19; an affirmance of an order disqualifying a law firm from representing defendants while the firm was also representing a prospective trial witness with different interests; and a dismissal of an action seeking the refund of a federal tax penalty where the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.Appellate Division, First Department: April 12, 2022
Accounting Ordered Where Company's Bookkeeping Is Inadequate or Nonexistent
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now