Skilled in the Art: More on Apple's Ex Parte Misconduct Claims | Let Russ August Entertain You
Apple isn't letting go of its misconduct claim against Voip-Pal.com any time soon. Plus, a surprise hire at L.A.'s Russ August & Kabat.
January 30, 2018 at 08:30 PM
4 minute read
Welcome to Skilled in the Art, hacking cough edition. I'm Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham. I'm under the weather so will keep this newsletter brief. Send tips, emails and homeopathic remedies to [email protected]. Or find me on Twitter @scottkgraham.
|
Apple: If PTAB Didn't Recognize Ex Parte Contact, Why Should We Have?
Apple isn't letting go of its spectacular misconduct claim against Voip-Pal.com any time soon. As I reported this week, the iPhone maker has tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners Mark Perry and Brian Buroker for anticipated appellate proceedings in Apple v. Voip-Pal.com. This is the case in which Apple's opponent was sending letters to the PTAB demanding — and getting — new judges for a patent validity challenge. The new judges then disagreed with the original judges on a key issue and ruled in Apple's favor.
Apple outlines some egregious conduct — I'd love to fast-forward 18 months to the Federal Circuit arguments – but its case has one glaring weakness. Apple knew about the first of six letters former Voip.Pal CEO Thomas Sawyer sent to the PTAB way back in May, but didn't speak up until December, after it lost the final written decision.
Apple and its Erise IP counsel are taking a new approach to shoring up this weakness. Apple argues in a brief filed Friday that Voip-Pal fooled everyone — including the PTAB — by holding out Sawyer as a mere shareholder acting on his own initiative. “Apple was in good company” by not recognizing the significance of the letter, Erise's Adam Seitz writes. “The board also did not recognize the letters were from Voip-Pal and took no subsequent action. … Nobody took action earlier than now because Voip-Pal succcessfully hid its involvement.”
Earlier this month Voip-Pal admitted that Sawyer had consulted with firm lawyers and management on the letters. “Voip-Pal hid the truth,” Seitz writes, “and it cannot pass the blame for its deception to Apple.”
|
Russ August Expands Into Media IP
This is not one I saw coming. Russ August & Kabat, a Los Angeles firm known primarily for representing patent holders in high-stakes litigation, has brought aboard veteran entertainment litigator Stanton “Larry” Stein to expand the firm's IP practice into entertainment and media litigation.
Stein is best known for protecting the rights of talent and production companies. Russ August's press release announcing the hire notes that has included copyright and trademark protection for reality television formats, and a recent IP dispute over the use of “Godzilla” in a motion picture.
Russ August's “highly respected IP practice and extensive trial experience fit perfectly with the entertainment, branding, and business needs of our clients,” Stein said in the press release. “The opportunity was too good to pass up,” firm managing partner Larry Russ said.
Stein was a name partner in Dreier Stein Kahan Browne Woods George, which split apart in 2009 after founder Marc Dreier ran into legal troubles. A handful of lawyers including Stein joined Liner Yankelevitz Sunshine & Regenstreif, while others re-formed as Browne Woods George. The Liner firm merged with DLA Piperlast year.
Making the jump with Stein are his longtime partners Bennett Bigman and Ashley Yeargan, plus senior associate Diana Sanders.
|
'Behind the Trial' Podcast Lines Up IP Heavy Hitters
McKool Smith and Benchmark Litigation are teaming up on a series of podcasts with some of the nation's most iconic trial lawyers. Behind the Trial sounds like it could have some IP flavor. McKool's Courtland Reichman is hosting the series. His first guest was Cravath's Evan Chesler (currently representing Qualcomm in its patent battle with Apple) and Boies Schiller's David Boies is scheduled. The episode I'll be most interested to hear: U.S. District Judge William Alsup.
OK, I've got to go gulp down some Robitussin now. See you all again on Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
The Law Firm Disrupted: Big Law Profits Vs. Political Values
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
