Caesars' Final Big Law Bankruptcy Bill Tops $160M
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., one of America's biggest gaming companies, will pay more than $160 million to a half-dozen Am Law 100 firms for their services during its nearly three-year stay in Chapter 11 that concluded in October.
December 06, 2017 at 04:33 PM
3 minute read
In bankruptcy, the house always pays.
Caesars Entertainment Operating Co., one of America's biggest gaming companies, will pay more than $160 million to a half-dozen Am Law 100 firms for their services during its nearly three-year stay in Chapter 11 that ended in October.
The final bills, made available in a summary court filing Tuesday, still require approval from U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Benjamin Goldgar of the Northern District of Illinois. The payments to outside firms have slowed within the past year as the bankruptcy drew to a close, as previously noted by The American Lawyer.
The biggest winner in the bankruptcy that shed roughly $10 billion in Caesars' corporate debt is Kirkland & Ellis, which billed for $76.9 million in fees in its role as lead counsel to the company. The firm's work was led by James Sprayregen and David Seligman and included former partner Paul Basta, who recently picked up his first role as co-chair of the bankruptcy practice at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Winston & Strawn, which last year wrapped up its work as legal counsel for examiner Richard Davis, billed a total of $30.6 million. Davis, a former Weil, Gotshal & Manges partner and member of the Watergate Special Prosecution, was investigating whether the parent company of Caesars stripped the operating company of profitable assets before it filed for bankruptcy.
That report said Caesars could be liable for up to $5 billion in damages for the reshuffling, although a deal was struck to avoid litigation on that front. Proskauer Rose billed $28.7 million in legal fees representing a committee of unsecured creditors. Jones Day billed another $25.1 million for its work on behalf of a group of second-lien junior bondholders.
Paul Hastings and DLA Piper also played roles in the Chapter 11 case. Paul Hastings billed about $284,000 for its work as special conflicts counsel to Caesars. And DLA Piper billed roughly $180,000 for its work in 2015 as special conflicts counsel to the debtor.
The bankruptcy by Caesars was the result of debt piled onto the gaming company by a $31 billion leveraged buyout by Apollo Global Management LP and TPG Capital LP of what was then Harrah's Entertainment. The deal, announced in December 2006, closed in January 2008.
In the end, those owners gave up most of their stake in Caesars, which was valued at $950 million. Creditors of Caesars owned about 70 percent of the company as it emerged from bankruptcy under a plan agreed upon in September.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Am Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 2LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 3'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 4Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 5PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250