Report Says Law Firm Demand Hit New Heights in Second Quarter
Demand for law firms' services in the second quarter of 2018 grew more than in any quarter during the past six years, according to an analysis by Thomson Reuters.
August 14, 2018 at 07:00 AM
3 minute read
Demand for law firms' services grew at a higher clip in the second quarter of 2018 than in any quarter during the past six years, according to a new report from Thomson Reuters that states firms also achieved notable growth in rates and productivity.
Demand for legal services, measured in hours billed, rose 1.4 percent in the second quarter, Thomson Reuters said.
As has been the case for the past few years, the country's largest and most profitable firms, the Am Law 100, experienced the greatest growth in demand, ratcheting up 3.2 percent. That compared to a 0.2 percent decline for the Second Hundred (the sixth consecutive quarter of Second Hundred demand declines) and 1.8 percent demand growth for midsized firms.
Worked billing rates—the invoices that firms send to clients—rose 3.4 percent in the second quarter, marking the fourth consecutive quarter of growth above 3 percent. Am Law 100 firms again led the way with 4.2 percent growth, compared to 2.8 percent growth for the Second Hundred and 3 percent growth for midsize firms.
The upbeat results are in sync with broader reports of a strong U.S. economy, which grew at a 4.1 percent annualized rate in the second quarter, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. They also continue a prolonged period of volatility in the law firm economy, coming on the heels of an unexpectedly soft first quarter that saw demand drop by 1 percent. On the year, demand is up 0.4 percent, which compares to six-month demand growth in 2016 and 2017 of a mere 0.1 percent.
Productivity ticked up 0.9 percent during the second quarter to bring that metric—the number of hours billed per attorney—to basically flat for 2018. The productivity increase, a rarity in recent years, was mostly due to shrinking or stagnant head count at firms.
Leading the trend in slowing personnel count are midsize firms, which shrunk their attorney rolls by 0.1 percent in the second quarter of this year. Am Law 100 firms grew head count by 1.6 percent in the second quarter, while the Second Hundred grew their ranks by 0.4 percent.
The strength of litigation practices, a segment that has underperformed in recent years, was one surprising note in the Thomson Reuters report. Demand for litigation, which grew 2.2 percent, was higher than any other practice during the second quarter. For the year, litigation demand is up 0.6 percent, marking the first time since 2012 that demand for litigators' time has been positive at the halfway point.
The Thomson Reuters report was cautiously optimistic that 2018 will be a strong year for law firms.
“At the halfway point of 2018, the large law firm market is poised for a potentially strong second half,” the report said. “However, if the past few quarters have taught us anything, it's to expect the unexpected.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250