Holland & Knight Nabs $10M Fee Award In Subway Co-Founder Case
The fees and costs awarded were nearly as high as the approximately $13 million verdict in the underlying case.
January 09, 2018 at 04:01 PM
3 minute read
Holland & Knight attorneys were awarded more than $10 million in fees and costs on a nearly $13 million verdict they won for the estate of a Subway co-founder.
The fee award stemmed from the jury's finding of civil theft against developer Anthony Pugliese, his business manager Joseph Reamer and the Pugliese Co. The defendants stole $2.9 million from Subway co-founder Fred DeLuca that was meant to be invested in a real estate project south of Orlando, the jury found in February 2017.
Civil theft findings allow judges to award attorney fees before an appeal is complete. The defendants are challenging the DeLuca verdict before the Fourth District Court of Appeal.
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Donald Hafele on Friday awarded Holland & Knight about $8.6 million in attorney fees, $1.3 million in costs and $19,000 in expert witness fees for eight years of litigation. He also added $317,000 in prejudgment interest for a total of $10.3 million.
The firm tallied about 25,000 hours of work on the civil theft claims from 10 attorneys and two paralegals.
“The amount of attorney's fees and costs awarded by the court was reasonable, given the fact that the Pugliese parties contested nearly every issue, regardless of how small or insignificant it was,” said Holland & Knight partner Rick Hutchison in West Palm Beach, who put in more than 5,000 hours on the claims.
The defense challenged the fee award, arguing Holland & Knight deserved no more than about $1.5 million in fees, particularly given that the civil theft award was $2.9 million.
The judgment came to $12.8 million after the theft amount was tripled and the jury awarded $4 million for breach of contract. The judge added interest but deducted $1.2 million in restitution Pugliese paid as the result of a criminal case in which he was sentenced to six months in jail and 10 years of probation.
“The DeLuca parties' counsel were only able to convince a jury to award an additional $1.7 million in damages after 20 days of trial,” wrote Pugliese attorney John Mariani of Kammerer Mariani in West Palm Beach in a court filing. “Consequently, compared to the $43 million they demanded but did not receive, the DeLuca parties cannot state to this court that the attorney's fees expended are justified by the result.”
Mariani did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The door is still open for the DeLuca parties to ask for more attorney fees under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act after the appeal is done.
Along with Hutchison, the Holland & Knight attorneys who billed for the civil theft claims were partners Christopher Bellows, Kelly-Ann Cartwright, John Chapman, Jason Lazarus, Joshua Levenson, Ilene Pabian, Matthew Zimmerman and associates Eleni Kastrenakes Howard and Benjamin Taormina.
“The DeLuca parties are pleased with the result and appreciate the hard work of the jury and the court,” Hutchison said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250