Planned Subdivision • Permissible Uses of Undesignated Property • Ownership of Roads

Starling v. Lake Meade Prop. Owners Ass’n, Inc., PICS Case No. 17-0892 (Pa. May 25, 2017) Wecht, J.; Dougherty, J., concurring and dissenting. (46 pages).

Property owner did not have title to adjacent undesignated property in planned subdivision where the illustrated metes and bounds of the subdivision plan, which was the only ascertainable boundary to the owner’s lot, did not encompass the undesignated property. Order of the superior court reversed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]